On Friday, August 17th I found that a new kitten I had adopted about a week earlier was limping on his front leg. By the early afternoon he was lethargic, shaking, and cried every time he was picked ... Read More
On Friday, August 17th I found that a new kitten I had adopted about a week earlier was limping on his front leg. By the early afternoon he was lethargic, shaking, and cried every time he was picked up. I made an appointment at Kentmere with a new vet we had not seen before, Dr. Tancredi, for that afternoon. Dr. Tancredi was not especially warm with me or the kitten, but having grown used to Dr. Coogan's matter-of-fact manner this did not bother me. He asked about the lameness, and I told him it had come on suddenly, and also told him of the kitten's near-constant shaking. He stood the kitten up, flexed the lame paw that the kitten was favoring, eliciting a sharp cry from the kitten, and then proceeded to do the same again. That was the entirety of Dr. Tancredi's physical examination of my kitten. He did not take the kitten's temperature, examine the kitten elsewhere, or even watch him walk. He told me it was likely a soft-tissue injury and that he would prescribe anti-inflammatories. He referred to my male kitten as a "she" throughout the entire examination, despite the cat's name being "Mr. Bojangles." I asked if I should ice the paw, and Dr. Tancredi snickered and responded with a wry "if it makes you feel better," and then left to get the anti-inflammatories. He returned, told me that the kitten was too small for anti-inflammatories and said, "now the icing sounds like a good idea." He told me that if the lameness was still present by Monday to return, and promptly left, calling out "no charge for today" behind him as he exited the room. I sat in the examination room for nearly a minute afterward confused as to whether that flippant remark, shouted as Dr. Tancredi had his back to me and was leaving, was the conclusion of our visit. The kitten remained alarmingly lethargic for the rest of the day, and the following morning appeared to be limping on a different leg and was still shaking quite badly. I called Kentmere for another appointment, mentioned that the kitten was still shaking and seemed to be doing worse. Dr. Tancredi said, "well, now that he is presenting with new symptoms you should bring him back in." These were, in fact, not new symptoms but the very same ones I had complained of the day earlier. Frustrated, I made an appointment with a different vet, and the experience was entirely different: she greeted the kitten warmly, inspected him thoroughly and closely, took his temperature, watched him walk, and asked me several questions. As it turns out Bo had a severe fever (hence the shaking) and appeared to have the calicivirus. The vet administered IV fluids, gave Bo an antibiotic for any secondary illnesses that could follow from the virus, and gave him a small dose of anti-inflammatories and provided us with a pack of the same. That afternoon he was alert, curious, and not shaking. By Sunday he was walking around, and by Monday he was his happy, confident, mischievous self. My displeasure with my visit with Dr. Tancredi is two-fold: 1) the way he treated and spoke to me was glib, callous, and quite frankly, rude; and 2) the way he treated my kitten was as though the examination was an inconvenience. When speaking to me Dr. Tancredi was dismissive, and I got the distinct impression he thought I was overreacting to a simple kitten sprain. I found the comment that I should ice Bo's paw "if it made me feel better" incredibly insulting, implying that I was being silly or overly cautious. Though far more upsetting than his rudeness towards me was his lack of interest in Bo. Had Dr. Tancredi taken the minute it took the second vet we saw to take Bo's temperature he would have realized right away that Bo was not suffering from a sprain. Bo shivered and shook with a high fever unnecessarily for a whole extra evening because of Dr. Tancredi's indifferent and ineffectual examination of what turned out to be a pretty sick little guy. I left Kentmere Friday afternoon feeling as though my pet's sickness had been trivialized, my concern mocked, and like I had wasted Dr. Tancredi's time. By contrast, I left our other vet appointment on Saturday happy and comfortable in the knowledge that Bo was getting the care and help he needed and deserved, and that I was treated like a thoughtful and contentious owner. I am sorry to say that after nearly ten years of both my mother and my animals being seen at Kentmere we will not ever be returning to this practice again. Though we value and appreciate Dr. Coogan for his excellent service to our other animals, this experience with Dr. Tancredi was enough to warrant a permanent change. My two cats and my mothers two cats and one dog will no longer be patients at Kentmere, and both she and I will strongly advise friends and family with pets to stay away from this practice due to its unconscionable lack of care and professionalism. Read Less