Although it has been some time since this initial post was made, I was only recently made aware of its presence. This case bears comment because the owners' claims are patently false. Tthis patient ... Read More
Although it has been some time since this initial post was made, I was only recently made aware of its presence. This case bears comment because the owners' claims are patently false. Tthis patient did in fact receive a full physical examination in front of the owner. A tentative diagnosis was made, other possibie diagnoses were discussed, and the owners were told what further tests and treatment would be needed. In spite of being told that the prognosis would be poor without hospitalization for treatment. and good with such treatment, for reasons of their own they decided against our best recommendations. They instead decided to have us provide only temporary treatments. We informed them that while such treatment was only useful in the very short term, that additional care was going to be needed, and that he could worsen quickly, without warning, because of the nature of the disease. This did not sway their decision. Reluctantly, and with their understanding that this would be unlikely to be successful, but was better than nothing, we provided this lesser treatment, we reiterated the need for hospitalization, and they went home with their puppy. I am sorry for their loss, but their puppy's death was not because of inappropriate action or inaction on our part. Read Less