One star is for the first few years of good treatment for my dog. In my view, this vet started out as a good practitioner, not pursuing unnecessary services or overcharging. But, subsequent experience... Read More
One star is for the first few years of good treatment for my dog. In my view, this vet started out as a good practitioner, not pursuing unnecessary services or overcharging. But, subsequent experiences resulted in a different opinion.A year ago my dog's hair started thinning on her head but it wasn't mange. Bloodwork showed that she had hypothyroidism, and she went on meds until the hypothyroidism corrected itself (apparently, it can correct in dogs). A dog health journal I subscribe to contained an article that the blood analysis range for hypothyroidism had been revised by the veterinary field. When I mentioned this to the vet, she said she hadn't known about that. I brought her a copy of the article at my dog's re-check. Issues of far greater concern to me, however, occurred more recently.My dog needed a bladder aspiration as follow-up to a VCA surgeon having found crystals in her urine during preparation for surgical removal of a cyst in her anal tract. The day of her appointment with Del Ray Animal Hospital, I brought her directly from my home without allowing her to go #1 so that she'd have a full bladder...she made a quick #1 at 4:30 am, but at 10:30 am, appointment time 6 hours later, she certainly had a full bladder. The vet allegedly felt my dog's bladder to see if it was full and claimed it was empty -- despite my telling the vet that my dog hadn't yet emptied her bladder. The vet said it was necessary to to give my dog a diuretic and fluids. While waiting for her bladder to "fill up," during which she was desperately pulling to go outside, my 7-and-a-half-year-old, housebroken dog involuntarily emptied her overly-full bladder in the waiting room. The vet then said she had to check to see if there was enough urine left to test. While the vet tech held my dog up, the vet felt my dog's abdomen and said she couldn't find the bladder and then, after further feeling around, said she found it but that it was lower than normal on most dogs...?? She said there was still some urine and performed the aspiration. In my opinion, the vet felt the wrong place on my dog's abdomen before giving her fluids/the diuretic; and that, coupled with the fact my dog hadn't gone #1 in 6 hours -- again, communicated to the vet during the bladder aspiration appointment and before she administered the fluids/diuretic -- my dog did not require fluids or a diuretic, which I paid for at the time of service but decided to question upon later receiving a bill for an additional, overlooked charge. I nicely communicated my concerns to the office manager via phone and inquired about the additional charge in light of my concerns and asked that she please have the vet call me. When the vet called back, I described everything to her in case the office manager skewed what I communicated, and, notably, the vet did NOT deny having said that she hadn't been able to locate my dog's bladder. In fact, she didn't address ANYTHING I said. Rather, she suggested I seek veterinary care elsewhere. The vet added that she does 20 of these procedures every week and that she has been practicing for 30 years, I assume to imply that she never makes any mistakes. She also mentioned that I had previously questioned her diagnosis of a cyst aspiration...more on that below.The vet took zero responsibility, and her reaction was, in my view, shocking and unprofessional. And, this wasn't the only recent occasion on which I had doubts: during an aspiration of a lump under my dog's armpit, the vet immediately pronounced that it was just a fatty cyst...she made the diagnosis by sight only, which I felt -- and which the VCA surgeon confirmed -- was improper practice. I had asked the vet whether she was going to have the extraction tested and she said "no." The VCA surgeon, however, stated that cytology must be performed to be certain there are no cancer cells. (I've had cysts aspirated myself, and if my human doctor simply looked at the needle to diagnose me without sending the contents out for analysis, I'd have reported him.) So, I brought my dog back to Del Ray for yet another aspiration of the same lump (for lab analysis) and explained to the vet what the surgeon said and that this was also for my own peace of mind. I honestly didn't want my dog poked and prodded more than absolutely necessary, but in this case it was necessary, and I stated this to the vet as well during our last phone call. I feel that a client should be allowed to air a concern and have it addressed and resolved in a professional manner and that the appropriate response to an additional charge, in this case in connection with a highly likely unnecessary procedure -- fluids and diuretic -- should have been to dismiss that added charge...whether or not the vet could admit to fault. Both me and my dog deserve better treatment. I want the best care for my beloved pet and to be treated with respect and, therefore, we will not be returning to this veterinarian or practice. Read Less