Facts:Saturday, 1/12: 12 year-old long-hair cat brought to Waltham Animal Hospital in the morning for a "lion cut" haircut. Sedation requested, having had about a dozen haircuts with sedation since 20... Read More
Facts:Saturday, 1/12: 12 year-old long-hair cat brought to Waltham Animal Hospital in the morning for a "lion cut" haircut. Sedation requested, having had about a dozen haircuts with sedation since 2009.Cat picked up from vet in mid-afternoon, still heavily sedated. On the way out Ruth Merola comments that the cat has some "nicks" from the haircut.Over-sedation:Cat remains heavily sedated well into the evening, unable to walk. Having taken the cat for about a dozen haircuts since 2009 in which sedation was used, as well as for a recent bladder surgery, the degree to which cat is sedated so long after returning from vet is alarming. Cat does not move from spot to eat, drink, or use litter box.By the evening we decide to check the payment record to see what exactly was given to him. The receipt indicates double the charge for "tranquilizer", without amount of tranquilizer listed.Blood-drawn:Unusual amount of blood and bruising along forelimb where vet appeared to have difficulty drawing blood for recommended blood work. Again, the cat is 12 years old, and has had blood drawn many times before, without signs of any difficulty.HaircutImmediately clear that groomer had used the lowest possible setting for the haircut, cutting fur down to the skin. (Later, a second vet, one not affiliated with Waltham Animal Hospital or Ruth Merola, would note that the cat had been shaved as if being prepped for surgery.) Cat visibly speckled in blood.Sunday: Cat still not eating, does not move from where placed on Saturday. By late evening, we become very concerned about cat's health. Begin to check "nicks" from haircut. Checking cat's underside reveals several (5-6) serious lacerations, including a very bad open wound (3 cm) under front right limb. It appears that his skin had gotten caught in groomers clippers in several places.Monday: Cat brought to a second veterinarian on Monday evening, after cat had not moved from place or eaten all day. Second vet prescribes antibiotics and pain medication ($150). Vet tech shocked at cat's condition, recommends returning to Ruth Merola's office for reimbursement of all costs.Tuesday: No visible improvement. Cat doesn't eat, so won't take antibiotics. Cat finally drinks some water, urinates.Wednesday: No visible improvement for much of day. Cat finally eats for the first time since Friday evening (!), when food was taken away in advance of visit for grooming. Cat remains in obvious pain and discomfort, and fails to move except for single visit to litter box.Thursday-Friday: Cat's condition improves slightly. Wounds still open, red, tender.Saturday: Return to Waltham Animal Hospital with photos of cat and request reimbursement for (1) haircut - $50, (2) sedative -$60, and (3) bill for antibiotics and pain medication - $150.Ruth Merola returns $80 while mocking, "They are not open wounds! ... Yes, he is dying!" Merola returns $30 for double billing of sedation, but denies cat to have been over-sedated. Says other $50 "is a gift." Asked to leave Waltham Animal Hospital, dared to "pursue it all you like."This has been an awful experience. We did not think that a haircut could go so wrong. Quite simply, we were wrong to trust Ruth Merola and Waltham Animal Hospital with our cat. Her groomer hurt him badly, and Ruth Merola failed to take responsibility. It's an impressive combination of gross incompetence and a lack of compassion. This is not a safe place for your pet. Read Less