In response to J.S of Sayville. The Veterinary Hospital was aware of the concern J.S of Sayville had for how much her visit would cost. All recommendations for optimal care were still given to the J.... Read More
In response to J.S of Sayville. The Veterinary Hospital was aware of the concern J.S of Sayville had for how much her visit would cost. All recommendations for optimal care were still given to the J.S's husband (since she was not present during the exam she is complaining about) and some were declined at his request. It is common for people to prioritize what procedures are performed and which will be performed at a later date. There is no pressure for clients to do everything but it is still our duty and practice to educate our clients as to what is the best optimal level of care. Furthermore, when the doctor performed the annual exam it was found that the dog's chronic eye issue had gotten worse. This is caused mostly to the fact that the pet owner had not kept on top of the issue by renewing the pet's eye medication (Tacrolimus). Tacrolimus, a medication that was prescribed to be administered to both eyes twice a day should only last about 3 months, however it had been over 6 months since she last purchased it on December 4, 2013. The date of the exam was May 16, 2014. The doctor discussed this with the client's husband. The doctor explained that the eyes are extremely dry and this dryness had caused an infection in the dog's eyes. A test would need to be performed to determine if the medication should be changed or exactly how much medication would need to be administered. Her husband agreed to follow the doctor's recommendations on how to rectify the issue. The client's husband was given the typical course of best medical treatment to fix the problem and he made the decision to follow this best medical advice. On May 16, 2014 the client's husband purchased a 3 month supply of Tacrolimus and Neopolydex ointment to treat and control the eye infection. This was paid for by her husband and given to her husband at the time of the exam visit. The wife states that services were not approved but in fact her husband, being of age, sound mind, and body made a decision to follow best medical advice since she was not physically present.Had the client followed the doctor's recommendations this medication would have been refilled three months prior to this exam and a follow up visit would have been performed to recheck the eyes. Perhaps the eye infection would not have been an issue on May 16, 2014.Another misleading statement is that Dr. Balbour would not fax a script to the new vet. The client told Island Veterinary Hospital that she had recently moved and on occasion had been going to another hospital because it was closer to her. Mrs. J.S expressed how happy she was with the other vet hospital, therefore, we suggested that she simply continue to go to one hospital since it was closer and more convenient to her home, to avoid confusion, and is unhappy with our prices. Due to this there was no need for Island Veterinary Hospital to give her a prescription (because it was recently refilled) and the other hospital was aware of the eye problem already and could simply give her the medication when the current supply runs out (as stated above this medication should last three months). This hospital followed owner's request, made on May 21, 2014, and faxed the pet's records to the other animal hospital. Once records are requested to be fax/ transferred to another hospital, because a client is changing vets, they automatically became inactive and the other hospital authorizes medications.You decide. If you want a veterinarian that is going to educate you and inform you of all the best medical advice then Island Veterinary Hospital is the hospital for your pets. If you don't want a kind companionate staff to care for your pets the way you care for them than take J.S's advice. Read Less